72ScampTramp
Scamp Tramp
Welcome back stroker.
Welcome back Stroker. The 284/484 was designed to be a RV cam for 360's in 4 wheel drive pick up's. They make torque and with the right combination you guys are getting some pretty good times at the ol' drag strip. As we all know, cams are a tough call. I read here a long time ago, choosing between 2 cams, take the smaller one. Bigger is not always better. toolman
RV cam for 360s in a 4 wheel drive?.....have you ever used one before?
you can barely get the power brakes to work ......
*P4120231 284/284 68 108 .484/.484 P4120249 2600-6000 Drag mod. comp w/ auto or 4 speed
RV cam for 360s in a 4 wheel drive?.....have you ever used one before?
you can barely get the power brakes to work ......
*P4120231 284/284 68 108 .484/.484 P4120249 2600-6000 Drag mod. comp w/ auto or 4 speed
Go to League Reed I took a solid lifter cam out of my 340 because I didn't have the rocker Shaft or the Rockers that would support it. My dumb *** should have bought them because I could have got the bananas and the adjustables for 400 off of a Military aviation mechanic who happened to be a nitro burning Mopar Feind Specializing in 340 A bodies with his own Mechanic businessYour right about the lift on the cam taking a little power away and i agree.
A set of 1.6 rockers installed and track tested would be a cool test on any purple shaft due to most of them being on the conservative side as far as the lift goes.
There are better high lift cams available for sure but you have to buy all new valve train parts most of the time to make them work correctly and last.
But you know how the story goes....#-o
If you only have so much cash i believe it's better to use your stock valve gear and heads and put the extra cash in the carb and converter and as always ----never enough gear lololol
My coronet is screaming for 2.02 valves and a higher lift cam for sure.
I would have done this buy now but my engine suffers from a piston with no valve reliefs.
It's made of keith black hyper material but looks just like a stock dish piston.
I think i could put more lift in my 318 stock engine.
Hey that's an idea :idea1:
I had similar results. In the mid 70" I ran a 70 340 4 speed Duster with the 284/484 installed 4 degrees advanced. 4.30 gears 28" slicks, Holley 780 and Mallory dual point ignition and some Hedman headers. At Tampa drags which was said to be 66' short it ran 12.97. At Twin City Dragstrip it ran 13.07 which was suppose to be a 1/4 mile legit track...........Here's my old combo..............1970 340 stock bore and rotating assambly........284/484 purple shaft, advanced 2 *.....2.02 X heads with 3 angles on the seats and valves......stock springs and valve gear, LD340 intake, 750 Carter Competition series carb, recurved dizzy..all in by 2200, 727 with factory hi stall........3.23 gears .....245/60/14 BFGs...full bodied 70 swinger......13.2@105 mph........kim.........oh ya, 3475lbs with me in it.......
I beileve this cam capable of the power with a;
750+ cfm
RPM
10-1
well ported 2.02-1.60/heads, or Edelbrocks prep'd
Large tube (?) headers. IMO, 1-3/4 primary tube headers. IDK if you all would call that a larger tube header. (For the street? Again, IDK.) But that is what I would use.
I'd rather run the Comp updated version myself.
The guys page said 9.5-1, which IMO, is light on squeezzee
His head flow is a mystery, just his reported findings on max flow. which would suggest a full porting.
He mentioned larger tube headers but not the actual primary size.
Also, what did it have after the headers on the dyno? 3 inch pipe into bullet race mufflers? Open header?
Really, to much out there to start throwing stones on what appears to be a possible "Happy" dyno reading?
My friend has the 509 in his 71 to do with the four speed in 391 it works pretty good in that damn good actually but he used to work in a machine shop he's done a lot of head work to those things and he's got like some kind of NASCAR intake on thereI had one in my 65 Barracuda: 68 340, 2.02's, Hooker fenderwell headers (small port even) Strip Dominator intake, 750 Holley, 284-484 cam, MP 175K convertor (2200?) 3.91 rear. Light 'em up! Same cam and a STR-12 intake with a single Demon 650 felt a little slower but still spun em through 2nd. I liked it, 700 rpm idle in gear, about 750 out. Very tire limited back then due to fender lip. I heard the .509 cam was the dog!
It’s basically a step up from the 284/484 and a step down from the 292/509. The Mopar Performance engine book mentions that cam in an example of: changing cams after making some other drivetrain changes, and upping the cam to take advantage of those upgrades, such as a converter. One wants a little more than the current 284/484 but feels the 292/509 is too big for the combo. Bring in the 288/497.I’m sure we’re splitting hairs but how does the P4529959 cam compare to the 484/284 and the 509 cam.
It’s 497/288 on a 108 centerline.
I am running that cam now in my 360 with ported heads (around 250 at 500), Hughes 2500 stall, 3.23 gears in a ‘67 notchback barracuda. My opinion is the car comes on strong at 3500 and pulls to 6500. Sounds great at a stoplight.
It’s basically a step up from the 284/484 and a step down from the 292/509. The Mopar Performance engine book mentions that cam in an example of: changing cams after making some other drivetrain changes, and upping the cam to take advantage of those upgrades, such as a converter. One wants a little more than the current 284/484 but feels the 292/509 is too big for the combo. Bring in the 288/497.
And speaking of converters, you could really use a much higher stall than that 2500, like a 3500. Get right up to the rpm’s where the power comes on as you mention when you hammer it.
That cam was really for .500” lift rule oval track engines, but from what I’ve read can work great on the street as wellGreat article thanks for sharing. I’m surprised they decided to spit the gap between the two cams. Seems like they have a lot of duration for such a small lift cams but idk.
HOLY 10-YEAR-OLD THREAD REVIVAL!!!...