Mopar Muscle induction Extravaganza Dyno testing SBM intakes, comparison....

-
For its age and used in that era, does a mildly ported Torker flowing 236 at .500 suck?
Those are the specs on a friends car

I want a Torker for 2 reasons.
I'm using 70's speed parts on my car.
70's Torker were widely known. I love the design.

Secondly, I will be using 360 mag heads drilled for LA pattern for the Torker.

The CH318A Magnum as cast heads flow .227 @ .500

I'm very secure that this will be a good combo after I clean up the Mag heads , I'm hoping this will be enuff for 450 HP after all

Something is worth more to someone w one who desires it

Your second paragraph says it all. It’s your engine in your car. That intake is certainly period correct.

If that’s what you are going for then by all means use it.

It will do what you want it to and work. Lots of guys used them back in the day.

I say go for it.
 
For its age and used in that era, does a mildly ported Torker flowing 236 at .500 suck?
Those are the specs on a friends car

I want a Torker for 2 reasons.
I'm using 70's speed parts on my car.
70's Torker were widely known. I love the design.

Secondly, I will be using 360 mag heads drilled for LA pattern for the Torker.

The CH318A Magnum as cast heads flow .227 @ .500

I'm very secure that this will be a good combo after I clean up the Mag heads , I'm hoping this will be enuff for 450 HP after all

Something is worth more to someone w one who desires it
It definitely has the look. You should be able to find one for cheap too.
 
For its age and used in that era, does a mildly ported Torker flowing 236 at .500 suck?
Those are the specs on a friends car

I want a Torker for 2 reasons.
I'm using 70's speed parts on my car.
70's Torker were widely known. I love the design.

Secondly, I will be using 360 mag heads drilled for LA pattern for the Torker.

The CH318A Magnum as cast heads flow .227 @ .500

I'm very secure that this will be a good combo after I clean up the Mag heads , I'm hoping this will be enuff for 450 HP after all

Something is worth more to someone w one who desires it

It definitely has the look. You should be able to find one for cheap too.
65Valiant529
It definitely has the look. You should be able to find one for cheap too.
Torker on the way from @66Valiant528
Very reasonable price
Thank you
 
Torker II didn't appear until '80's bro....& more resembled a Holley Street Dominator, which resembled a slightly lower Offy Port-O-Sonic, which is a bit lower than a Holley Strip Dominator......
Killer6 back in the day a had a SBM Offy Super Sonic. Have you ever seen one of them?
 
When I get a chance I’ll throw the Ugly Torquer on a better flowing set of heads I have sitting here. I might have an M1 coming for my sons car.
Ugly Torker, ? it's totally symmetrical
Well, all 9st

PXL_20241008_212741858.jpg
 
pittsburghracer , there is a rumor of you passing ? what up with that ? you posted here at 11:11 est today
 
Only Port-O-Sonic, I'll guess that is a taller version?
It's a intake designed for a 4500 series carb. And it doesn't have the dividers in the intake runners.
 
It's a intake designed for a 4500 series carb. And it doesn't have the dividers in the intake runners.
After posting that, I saw the difference on the Olds versions, that should have some top-end potential.
 
First you have to realize the 6 pack was the older way of getting more cfm into the engine. Before 4bbl carbs were around. When they did come around, they were small in size. That’s why you see a Poly 318 with twin 4bbl carbs.

When the 6 pack came out for Chrysler, Holley did have bigger carbs than a 750. However, an 800 or 850 was as big as it got and it wasn’t exactly what you would use on the street for a small block of 340 ci. Not saying it wasn’t done. Just not a really good driver experience with them and the rest of a street combo.
IE; small cams and stock heads etc….

The Torker II is a single plane and not really looked after for low end torque and drivability like a dual plane. It’s two different intakes and use according.

I’ll tell you I have noticed that the single plane will fair better in the HP department and be faster at the track when camshafts exceed 255*’s @.050 and the car is light enough and the suspension is set up right to take advantage of a sizable camshaft.

All things being equal, the difference in performance makes will allow the car to go faster with a single plane, even with a loss of torque that the single plane is known for. The bigger the cam the more low end torque is lost in favor of high rpm hp, where the single plane will rule the day.

The 6 pack is the ultimate induction flexable enough to drive the street like grandma’s car yet be able to deliver mid 11 second drag strip times. While the dyno numbers tell you one thing, actual real world driving the two intakes are a bit different than what the dyno is telling you.

I like this test. It isn’t exactly what I’d call the truth due to the above paragraph on drivability but, it does also show that the Torker II isn’t as bad as reported here by many as good for nothing but a door stop. This isn’t true at all but I do suggest you treat it as a single plane that delivers a lack of good useable low end torque and it will work very well with a sizable camshaft.

Personally, I would use a cam smaller than 250*’s @.050 not matter what the dyno says. FWIW, port the Torker II & use a spacer on the carb for more plenum and high rpm power.

Also IMO, the Holley Street Dominator wasn’t properly used and should not have been included in this test since the engine build is basically, very - under-whelming for such an intake.
 
-
Back
Top