ian
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 23, 2008
- Messages
- 412
- Reaction score
- 54
Hey Ian, that would be 1 turn on left, 0 on right. We sit on the other side of the car.....Cheers
lol sorry ,your right
Hey Ian, that would be 1 turn on left, 0 on right. We sit on the other side of the car.....Cheers
I will try this. My season is over but next spring I will give this a shot.
For my car, it doesn't matter what I do to my caltracs. Top or bottom hole, preload or no preload. Shocks set from 1-9. Nothing changed.
90/10's up front.
If I was to do it over again, ladder bar would be my choice.
@inkjunky....Randy's car is a 4 link,square tube chassis and he regrets the 4 link. Wishes he would have gone ladder bar.He fought it for years, and has never got it where he wants it. it is good, but Steve Johansons notch back, 60's better with ladders. You didn't get to see it run this year.Steve's car has been around for years, won more then Randy's, has had different motors in it, and has always been deadly.
Randy's car runs 9'@ sea level, and here before the NHRA adj. clocks, our motors are identical except cam & carb.
Here is me taking Steve out @ Woodburn, the Race of Champions in my Daytona
@womanator: Looks like Woodburn?
@Ian: I couldn't get over the wierd feeling, of leaving in my buddies right hook Cuda @ Willowbank.The torque coming from the left, and going down in your seat at launch, compared to raising up in your seat, felt strange.Also they ran a 4 teeths full tree when I was there.
For the original poster, here is what worked on my car:
Bottom hole, 1 flat preload driver side, 2 flats preload passenger side.
Rear shocks set on 6.
I have a sneaking suspicion that this might change this fall, but as of right now, my car is still slightly faster on bone stock springs (1.49 60'). The one thing that the caltracs did do for my car was make it consistent when the track was crap, and make the launch level (no more twisting launch with 1 tire in the air).
Get your front end loose as you can, drop any extra weight off the front that you can (move battery to truck, remove font bumper, glass hood, etc), and get the nose low. These are the things that really helped my car get good weight transfer before adding the Caltracks.
I have been tuning my Caltracks for over a year, and I have not given up on them yet. I footbrake, current 60' times are usually low 1.50's (1.53-1.52). Last year in the fall I got one 1.49x 60', just a few thousandths slower than my best on stock springs...but I used to have 1.49-1.50 60' times on a regular basis on my stock springs.....Anyway, I should know later this month if my recent findings of transmission issues have any pay off with a quicker ET and 60'. I have 2 more races in my "slow" setup, then I'm switching it back to going fast....long story.
I run a BB somewhere around 600 hp and still use SS springs with clamps, i've also moved the axle back around an inch. Car runs on average 1.40 to 1.43 and has gone 1.39 before.
Mick
Hi All.
We've ran Caltracs for 13 years and with 3 different engine combo's (soon to be 4) we've been through a lot of what everyones mentioning.
OK from the beginning, we expected to run quicker with them straight away but didn't over the old superstock springs and snubber system. The car was much more consistant and drove nicer up the track this was with an 11sec 440 motor (550hp at 3800lb). Since we are bracket racers it was fine. 60fts were in the hi 1.5 lo 1.6 range.
Next combo was a 528 Iron motor indy heads. This eventually got down to 10.00's initially it was in the lo 11's. Here we discovered it was hitting the tyre hard, lots of seperation. Tightening the rancho to max helped as did tubes in the slicks and more pressure. Altering preload didn't seem to help. We had to change both sides the same if we did, as it would drive to one side or the other. We also started looking at the front, slowing the rise at the front helped a lot, c/e three ways were set at 60/40.
We started to get the "porpoising" problems when we got a handle on the engine tune and started to go quicker. A smaller higher stall converter gave us 4 tenths and showed up the problem more. We needed more pressure in the tyre and more front travel. 60fts in the mid 1.45's
By now we had the 572 motor in and we are running hi 9's we've altered the front suspension to give us as much travel as possible and were are running a 29inch front tyre to get the ride height back. We are now doing the odd massive wheelie (175ft) and always pulling the wheels at least 2ft. 60fts are 1.40 with a best of 1.37 (good air). A couple of seasons ago we fitted afco d/a's dynamic strut rods and tubula uca's with heim joints, the lower stock arms are boxed. Also fitted travel limiters. We can now control the hit on the tyre using the front. Car is really consistent we've gone a best of 9.57 and 142.
The setup is still hitting the tyre a little too hard in my opinion so for next season we've gone for afco d/a's and an anti roll bar on the rear to help since we are putting in a 655ci motor. Car is getting all the stuff to run in the 8's and 150mph + but we're keeping the caltracs
HTH's
^^^ No, no, no. You're just a couple of clicks off on the shocks is all. LOL
Hi All.
We've ran Caltracs for 13 years and with 3 different engine combo's (soon to be 4) we've been through a lot of what everyones mentioning.
OK from the beginning, we expected to run quicker with them straight away but didn't over the old superstock springs and snubber system. The car was much more consistant and drove nicer up the track this was with an 11sec 440 motor (550hp at 3800lb). Since we are bracket racers it was fine. 60fts were in the hi 1.5 lo 1.6 range.
Next combo was a 528 Iron motor indy heads. This eventually got down to 10.00's initially it was in the lo 11's. Here we discovered it was hitting the tyre hard, lots of seperation. Tightening the rancho to max helped as did tubes in the slicks and more pressure. Altering preload didn't seem to help. We had to change both sides the same if we did, as it would drive to one side or the other. We also started looking at the front, slowing the rise at the front helped a lot, c/e three ways were set at 60/40.
We started to get the "porpoising" problems when we got a handle on the engine tune and started to go quicker. A smaller higher stall converter gave us 4 tenths and showed up the problem more. We needed more pressure in the tyre and more front travel. 60fts in the mid 1.45's
By now we had the 572 motor in and we are running hi 9's we've altered the front suspension to give us as much travel as possible and were are running a 29inch front tyre to get the ride height back. We are now doing the odd massive wheelie (175ft) and always pulling the wheels at least 2ft. 60fts are 1.40 with a best of 1.37 (good air). A couple of seasons ago we fitted afco d/a's dynamic strut rods and tubula uca's with heim joints, the lower stock arms are boxed. Also fitted travel limiters. We can now control the hit on the tyre using the front. Car is really consistent we've gone a best of 9.57 and 142.
The setup is still hitting the tyre a little too hard in my opinion so for next season we've gone for afco d/a's and an anti roll bar on the rear to help since we are putting in a 655ci motor. Car is getting all the stuff to run in the 8's and 150mph + but we're keeping the caltracs
HTH's
Didn't take it as Caltrac bashing, was hoping that my experience might help a little. I understand your frustration. Like most stuff they need to be adjusted to work on Mopars and when you change the drivetrain combo you need to adjust the chassis too. Forgot to add a slo-mo video cam becomes a useful tool. You're absolutely right, there's more to a working Caltrac package than some springs, bars and shocks
Nice Valiant BTW
Correct.Great info,from experienced racers,on Cal Tracks,Thanks. Like any suspension setup, takes time to tune (like anything else...) This is intellicual info!