3705s are 750 cfm.Cool! Do you know the cfm rating of those carbs?
Agree on looks.
Ease of working on, questionable. Pros and cons to both.
I think there would be a wide price range depending on availability and condition - NOS vs rebuilt vs cores in need of rebuilding.Interesting to know how much they would cost.
I dunno yet. There are many variables such as: Will the local track be open and for how much longer; What is the weather like; Where do we choose to go in it; etc. I'm in the Pacific NW and don't plan on going to MATS or the Nationals with it; maybe a 50 mi radius?How many miles a year are you going to put on it?
Good to know but are they a true 750?3705s are 750 cfm.
What carbs are you more comfortable/experienced at tuning edlebrock holley etc.. ?
I buy a pair that you know well that are sized right.
The Carter and Edelbrock are dry flowed. I flow tested a 600 cfm AFB and it did just about dead bugs on exactly that.
Holley, as I understand it, wet flows there carbs.
Is there a difference somewhere in this?
IDK
Someone with a whole lot more experience and time than me should do a study/testing of wet vs dry, Carter vs Edelbrock vs Holley, 500 vs 600 vs 650 vs 750,... etc. Maybe it's been done and I'm just not aware of it? Probably deserves a thread of its own. Anyone?
I was being a little sarcastic, good ones are not cheap.I think there would be a wide price range depending on availability and condition - NOS vs rebuilt vs cores in need of rebuilding.
Edelbrock Performer/Carter AFB's are good.
AVS/AVS2 are very good street carbs. I've used the AVS in the past with good results.
If you got the knowhow and resources the Carter Thermoquads are pretty good too, but unfortunately not much aftermarket support.
I really like the Street Demons. Been daily driving with them on my duster in rain, shine and snow since 2017.
I was being a little sarcastic, good ones are not cheap.
I read somewhere on one of the racer threads (not a Mopar thread, maybe yellow bullet?) where someone had done exactly that. I have no clue where I saw it, however. If faulty memory serves, wet flow seemed to be about 95%, roughly, of dry flow.Someone with a whole lot more experience and time than me should do a study/testing of wet vs dry, Carter vs Edelbrock vs Holley, 500 vs 600 vs 650 vs 750,... etc. Maybe it's been done and I'm just not aware of it? Probably deserves a thread of its own. Anyone?
I read somewhere on one of the racer threads (not a Mopar thread, maybe yellow bullet?) where someone had done exactly that. I have no clue where I saw it, however. If faulty memory serves, wet flow seemed to be about 95%, roughly, of dry flow.
Edit: a Google search found it, on Speed Talk.