I think your idea of a harsh hit differs from mine.
I do believe the tamer is going to improve the hit, a softer hit.
It's hard to type. It's easier to say. Like I've said before, I'm not a fan of the CT for two reasons. One is how it mounts. I'm not carving my car up to mount it.
The second is how it functions. Again, I can say it much easier than to type it. But I'm not a fan of keeping the pressure ring off the disc.
Also, if it worked as well as is claimed, and you can leave at valve float, every Pro Stock racer on the planet would have one. It would be less complicated to tune and you could leave at valve float. I don't see that happening. I have a hard time believing Greg Anderson and Jason Line are missing this ding beater tuning device.
For guys like Jpar, that don't want to spend the money on a clutch, and don't mind cutting and fitting to make the CT fit it's a much better way to do it than just letting the clutch beat the hell out of everything.
There are also guys who are screwed by ignorant rules that force them to use a pressure plate that isn't adjustable. The CT is the best option out there.
I'd bet right now I could go to you tube and find 50 videos of stick cars and 49 of them will be barking the tires in every gear change. Not only is that hard on parts, it's slower. Yet you can't get them to buy a clutch. Or even the CT. They never learn
For the umpteenth time, those are my views on the CT. Does it have a place? Yes. Is it the best way to get the job done. Not in my opinion. Is it better than just killing the tire. ABSOLUTELY.
If you won't buy a clutch or can't afford one, get a CT. You can lower your ET a bunch.